Case study

R&D Tax Relief for Space Technology

Case study: Small-Spacecraft Thermal Control

An example of how Lister prepares R&D tax relief evidence for a space technology project.

Paylists’ powerful AI, Lister, reads the project data, searches published work and recommends an answer to each question below, with supporting references.

How Lister prepared these answers
  1. 01Reads project dataStages, timesheets, costs, tests and documents recorded in Paylists.
  2. 02Searches published workOpenAlex, Europe PMC, PubMed, arXiv, Crossref, OSTI, NASA NTRS, NIST and other sources.
  3. 03Recommends answersEach answer is supported by references for your team and R&D tax advisor to review.
Main question

What the R&D aim of the project is

  1. Lister recommended answer

    To maintain temperature-sensitive spacecraft components inside their operating envelope while meeting strict mass, power and volume constraints.

Main question

Scientific or technological uncertainty

  1. 01

    Describe exactly which uncertainties you need to resolve

    Lister recommended answer

    Whether a constrained combination of passive and active thermal-control components can manage worst-case transient orbital heat loads.

  2. 02

    Describe what made it a project to resolve a specified uncertainty

    Lister recommended answer

    Individual thermal-control technologies were already known, but the combined thermal response of the proposed constrained spacecraft configuration could not be predicted with sufficient confidence.

  3. 03

    Describe the steps you plan to take to resolve them

    Lister recommended answer

    Develop thermal models, simulate hot/cold orbital cases, perform thermal-vacuum tests and correlate measured results with the model.

  4. 04

    What difficulties are foreseen for the project

    Lister recommended answer

    Rapidly changing solar exposure, internal dissipation and limited radiator area can produce transient temperatures that steady-state analysis does not predict accurately.

  5. 05

    Information about any major changes to the aims, or new uncertainties that have been encountered, while running the project.

    Lister recommended answer

    Testing may show unexpected thermal coupling that requires changes to straps, coatings, heater logic or thermal isolation.

  6. 06

    How the uncertainties and other challenges were overcome (or not).

    Lister recommended answer

    The updated configuration would be retested under worst-case thermal-vacuum profiles and model correlation repeated.

Main question

An advance in science or technology

  1. 01

    A review of the current state of knowledge

    Lister recommended answer

    NASA documents established heaters, insulation, coatings, thermal straps, heat pipes and other SmallSat thermal-control methods.

  2. 02

    How the project sought an advance in a qualifying area of science or technology

    Lister recommended answer

    The project sought a validated thermal-control capability under a combination of mission constraints not readily predictable from component specifications.

Outcome

Result, conclusion and evidence

Result

The final configuration met the defined hot/cold envelope in the validated mission cases.

Conclusion

The advance is limited to the validated spacecraft and mission envelope.

Evidence still needed

Model versions, boundary conditions, component loads, thermal-vacuum data, calibration and model-to-test correlation.

References

Supporting references

  1. NASA Small Spacecraft Thermal Control.

    nasa.gov ↗
  2. NASA Passive Thermal Control Engineering Guidebook.

    ntrs.nasa.gov ↗
  3. NASA CubeSat thermal-control louvers.

    ntrs.nasa.gov ↗

Book a demo today

14-day free trial · No credit card · From £5 a month